Third-party risk management program best practices
As digital transformation picks up pace, companies are working with more vendors than ever. According to Gartner, 60% of organizations now work with more than 1,000 third-party vendors — including partners, sub-contractors, and suppliers.
These third parties are essential to helping businesses grow and stay competitive, but third parties can also introduce unwanted cyber risk and overhead into the organization.
This presents a unique set of challenges and potential risks for security professionals. Cybersecurity can’t be an obstacle to business growth, in fact it must be a facilitator. As such, security teams must keep up with the needs of the business and move faster to onboard vendors. They must also prioritize their limited resources to achieve the highest risk reduction in the most efficient way.
To achieve this, security managers must find ways to drive greater maturity across their third-party risk management (TPRM) program. Here are five areas where improved processes and technology can help.
1. Apply TPRM process, policy, & procedures consistently
Critical to creating any successful third party risk management program is ensuring that all business functions – particularly marketing, finance, legal, and procurement – agree upon and consistently apply third party risk management processes, policies, and procedures when onboarding new vendors.
To establish these procedures, security managers should work with the business to determine acceptable risk threshold policies and pre-screen vendors accordingly. If a third-party doesn’t meet these security guidelines, they can then be eliminated from the procurement process – allowing security teams to focus already stretched resources on evaluating vendors that have more desirable security postures.
Another crucial consideration is whether to adapt security assessments based on the partnership the organization will have with the vendor in question. After all, no two vendors are the same. Each third-party presents different risk levels, and therefore merits different treatment.
Security leaders should also consult with legal and finance teams to devise contractual controls and enforceable language to ensure compliance with those thresholds throughout the life of contracts.
2. Align cross-functional teams around risk reduction
A key characteristic of organizations with immature third-party programs is that various business disciplines often tackle third-party cyber risk reduction in siloes. Legal or procurement teams may have their own vendor screening criteria that are at odds with policy and procedures adopted by security professionals.
By contrast, in successful and mature third-party programs, these cross-functional teams are aligned around cyber risk reduction. They understand why it’s important, and they have adopted a collaborative vendor onboarding and risk management process that doesn’t roadblock them but keeps up with the speed of the business and what it’s trying to accomplish.
3. Champion TPRM outcomes in the boardroom
Cyber risk is a huge priority for the board, including the risk posed by third-party vendors and suppliers. They want greater oversight of these parties’ security risk profile through metrics and cyber security KPIs, but they also want security managers to link cybersecurity to business outcomes.
In a successful TPRM program, security leaders champion their achievements in the boardroom and communicate the impact of their TPRM initiatives through the lens of business value whether it’s reducing the time and costs involved in onboarding new vendors, driving cross-team collaboration around risk reduction, or enabling the business to move with confidence into new areas of growth.
Armed with this information, the board can focus on getting further behind security initiatives or adding additional resources.